Hard questions on Space-Time Continuum on interplay between spatial and verbal code in humans – crucial for a functional psychological paradigm

NB just draft needing more thinking … be careful .. if reading further!

The codes (we know of?) our brain evolution has used is a special case of “time-space continuum” – space-spatial and time-serial/verbal codes. The great challenge is to understand how homo sapiens build a extremely fast (3000.000 years) verbal code evolution ON/Depending the spatial (many millions of years evolution). How are they intervened? To have a functional psychology we need to understand some of it and then t will be easier (?) to understand how individuals´ unequally in real world  interplay concerning intervening of spatial and verbal code –in other words,  how is the real world interplay between what is physiological and psychological (which is represented in BOTH homo sapiens evolved part of our brain and parts of Limbic/mammalian parts of our brain?

History on time space interplay
” Einstein went on to present his findings mathematically: energy (E) equals mass (m) times the speed of light (c) squared (2), or E=mc2. The secret the equation revealed—that mass and energy are different forms of the same thing—had eluded scientists for centuries.” https://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/einstein/energy#:~:text=Einstein%20went%20on%20to%20present,had%20eluded%20scientists%20for%20centuries. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass%E2%80%93energy_equivalence

But then Einstein was wrong, when it came to Quantum Physics?
“Yet there is an unshakable view that he was wrong on quantum physics. Although it may be a subject of considerable debate, the core of his allegedly wrong demurral was the insistence on finding an objective reality underlying the manifestly bizarre behavior of quantum objects.” https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1511/1511.05098.pdf#:~:text=Yet%20there%20is%20an%20unshakable,bizarre%20behavior%20of%20quantum%20objects.

Or, can we simplify using integrated biofeedback to get on idea of an individual´s code intervening – while understand better and focus on the nature of interplay between spatial and verbal code and its consequences for conscious and not conscious information processing in real time, past and future time at individual level? Impossible? Maybe? Other suggestions? Do we need quantum physics/chemistry/biology/medicine to come closer?



  1. Also called space-time con·tin·u·um. the four-dimensional continuum, having three spatial coordinates and one temporal coordinate, in which all physical quantities may be located.
  2. the physical reality that exists within this four-dimensional continuum.


  1. of, relating to, or noting a system with three spatial coordinates and one temporal coordinate.
  2. noting, pertaining to, or involving both space and time:a space-time problem.


KOLLA inom bussiness https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228464672_Towards_Predictable_Assembly_of_Certifiable_Assets

” Nothing puzzles me more than the time and space; and yet nothing troubles me less. Time and space – time to be alone, space to move about – these may well become the great scarcities of tomorrow. Even in empty space, time and space still exist.”
” As a result, he (Einstein) found that space and time were interwoven into a single continuum known as space-time. And events that occur at the same time for one observer could occur at different times for another. Related: What would happen if the speed of light was much lower?” https://www.space.com/17661-theory-general-relativity.html

-> Was Einstein wrong? The case against space-time theory
“… To make progress, we might have to go a step further than saying space-time isn’t the smooth, continuous fabric Einstein suggested. According to Einstein, space-time is like a stage that remains in place whether actors are treading its boards or not —even if there were no stars or planets dancing around, space-time would still be there. However, physicists Laurent Freidel, Robert Leigh, and Djordje Minic think that this picture is holding us back. They believe space-time doesn’t exist independently of the objects in it. Space-time is defined by the way objects interact. That would make space-time an artifact of the quantum world itself, not something to be combined with it. ”It may sound kooky,” said Minic, ”but it is a very precise way of approaching the problem.”

The attraction of this theory — called modular space-time — is that it might help solve another long-standing problem in theoretical physics regarding something called locality, and a notorious phenomenon in quantum physics called entanglement. Physicists can set up a situation whereby they bring two particles together and link their quantum properties. They then separate them by a large distance and find they are still linked. Change the properties of one and the other will change instantly, as if information has traveled from one to the other faster than the speed of light in direct violation of relativity. Einstein was so perturbed by this phenomenon that he called it ’spooky action at a distance’.” https://www.space.com/end-of-einstein-space-time#:~:text=According%20to%20Einstein%2C%20space%2Dtime%20is%20like%20a%20stage%20that,time%20would%20still%20be%20there.

Our brain evolution might be a special case of the “modular space-time”-theory, where first in the primate and then faster and faster evolve in homo sapiens part (evolved last 300.000 years) the time .. serial .. verbal parts, in other words,  extremely fast develop but still depending still on the space … spatial parts (which are evolved dominating during millions of years, where psychology contains both time and space in ways we have limited knowledge about, but where Quantum physics may explain its separation while still at the same time are varying intervened – most notable within dreams.

Psychology is not just the homo sapiens serial brain part but still spatial dominating variable over individuals. “If spatial Limbic part is in conflict (stress?) with the verbal, serial analytical part, mostly the Limbic spatial one wins” a modification of Coué´s thinking. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89mile_Cou%C3%A9

In short, Cultural evolution rests on the (mostly) dominating spatial, Limbic part.

In defining psychophysiology, psychology is the bigger problem which most be easy to understand explained/formulated without using Quantum behaviors.